It is truly worth celebrating, what happened today when Donald Trump was finally forced by a court of law to transfer $5,625,005.48 to E. Jean Carroll’s bank account. We cannot forget the living hell she went through. E. Jean was sexually assaulted in a Bergdorf’s dressing room by Donald Trump. She was penetrated in such a way that it did not amount to rape under New York law but was declared a rape as “the word is commonly understood” by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who presided over her defamation suit against Trump.

I don’t know of any way to calculate how much courage it took for E. Jean to sue the President of the United States. She filed suit in 2019, claiming that Trump had defamed her in an interview after her article in New York Magazine, “Hideous Men,” was published in June of that year. Trump denied knowing her, he called her a liar, and of course, as proof that it never happened, Trump said “she’s not my type.”

That’s not just a regular lawsuit to file. Trump was in 2019 the most powerful man in the world. He had the full force of the federal government behind him. In fact, one of the first things he did was claim that he was acting in his “official capacity” as president when he responded to Carroll’s claims in the New York article. Later, in 2021, with Joe Biden in office, Trump’s lawyers would make another claim that he should be defended by Department of Justice lawyers. So, throughout the early months of her lawsuit against Trump, E. Jean was facing the possibility that lawyers representing the federal government could be opposing her in court.

In 2022, Trump posted on Truth Social about Carroll’s lawsuit, calling her claims a “con job,” a “hoax and a lie,” and a “complete scam.” In November of that year, Carroll would file another lawsuit against Trump that came to be known as “Carroll II,” for defaming her in the Truth Social post and adding a claim of sexual battery and rape under the “Adult Survivors Act,” which had been passed earlier in the year. The law allowed survivors to file civil lawsuits beyond the statute of limitations. In the new lawsuit, Carroll claimed that Trump had pulled down her tights, groped her genitals and raped her.

The case went to trial in federal district court in 2023. Carroll testified and underwent a blistering cross examination by Trump’s lawyer. Several witnesses testified to support Carroll, including one woman who had been sexually assaulted by Trump on an airplane. Trump did not testify, but a video of his deposition was shown to the jury, during which he denied Carroll’s allegations and claimed that he had not even read her article in New York.

During all this time, E. Jean was photographed going in and out of the federal courthouse in New York. Cable news anchors and guests commented on her outfits, her hairstyle, her sunglasses, as if she was appearing in a television show rather than suing the most powerful man in the world for sexual assault and battery and defamation. On so-called “conservative” media such as Fox News and online commentators, Carroll was subjected to frequently brutal takedowns and criticism.

After a day of closing arguments, the case went to the jury, which took all of three hours to reach a unanimous verdict in E. Jean’s favor, saying that she had been sexually assaulted by Trump and that he had defamed her. The jury awarded her $5 million in damages. Trump appeared on CNN and called her a “whack job,” denied that he knew her and claimed the trial had been “rigged.”

A second trial was held in early 2024 on Carroll’s subsequent claim that Trump had continued to defame her. Trump attended this trial on some days. On the day that the trial began, Trump posted 22 times about E. Jean. Carroll again appeared as a witness on her own behalf. During her testimony, Trump could be heard at the defense table saying things like “witch hunt” and “con job.” Trump himself briefly testified, standing by his statements that Carroll’s claims were a “hoax” and a “con job.”

Again, the jury took just three hours to find, unanimously, on Carroll’s behalf, this time awarding her $7.3 million in emotional damages, $11 million in damages to her reputation by Trump, and $65 million in punitive damages.

Trump appealed the verdict in the first trial for three years, finally to the Supreme Court, which refused earlier this year to hear his appeal. He has filed appeals of the second verdict as well, which have not completed their journey through the court system.

But today, all Trump’s lies and bluster and power to damage E. Jean Carroll was found wanting, and she finally received the jury’s award in the first trial. She has put the money in an account until Trump’s appeals of appeals of appeals are finished so if there is some decision returning the money to Trump, it will be there. But soon, the $5.6 million will be unquestionably hers.

E. Jean Carroll did something that the leaders and members of an entire political party have refused to do. She stood up to Donald Trump, and she won. She will go down in history for this fearless act. It took a woman to bring Donald Trump to justice. E. Jean Carroll is that woman. She has much to be proud of, and we have much to thank her for.

Give a gift subscription

Give a gift subscription

Leave a comment

Share

Donald Trump’s latest political stratagem is to label as “Communist” any disagreement with whatever passes as Trump’s ever-changing ideology.

Since Trump is repeating the label, we shouldn’t just dismiss it as a slip of the presidential tongue or misspeaking. He means it, and he expects voters to believe it and fear those who argue that there’s something wrong about a concentration of power and wealth in the upper tenth of a percent of Americans – a widespread polled opinion over time.

Of course, Trump seems to be targeting the few, but growing number of self-identified Democratic Socialists who have been winning elections since New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s campaign was such an overwhelming choice.

Three congressional candidates in New York City endorsed by Mamdani carried their primaries against otherwise “progressive” Democrats who have publicly supported aid to Israel. A Democratic Socialist upset a longtime Congresswoman from Colorado.  One of the two Senate candidates who appear tied in Michigan is a Democratic Socialist. Graham Platner’s campaign in Maine ran aground over his personal failures, but not because he espoused more access to health care and ending political rules  dictated by self-serving corporate interests.

The success of these Democratic Socialists has been as much about generational change and a desire to throw out entrenched politics of all parties as it has about specific policies.

In multiple recent speeches, Trump has warned of  a “resurgence of the communist menace in our land, including from newcomers to our country who embrace ideas totally opposed to our way of life and our great success.” What Trump said is, “Communism is a mortal threat to American liberty. It is the greatest threat to our country, including World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor or even 9/11.  Communism is the exact opposite of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It’s death, tyranny and the pursuit of evil.”

Using the Communist label is raising a bogeyman that is incorrect, even dishonest, and his broad attack on “godless” anti-Americanism is at odds with what more than half the country’s voters say is upsetting them. Just as Trump demeaned “affordability” as a made-up complaint of Democrats, or his attacks on immigration that built this country as an existential evil, or his insistence on ridding the country of regulations on corporate behaviors, Trump is not only wrong but actively misusing even the label itself for partisan gain.

What is ‘Communism’?

Communism is an ideology that advocates for the elimination of capitalism in favor of government control of the economy. Democrats, including democratic socialists, seem to favor a capitalist system where there is a fairer way to share the costs through taxes. In the last 100 years, Communism has involved authoritarian politics in the former Soviet Union and China, human rights abuse and rationing food.  Democratic Socialists take the opposite view on all of that.

Dan Froomkin of Press Watch argues that the news media are being too blasé about not pointing out Trump’s historical and political errors or the delusion of the speaker.

The very meaning of the political theory of Communism as outlined by Karl Marx advocates for a society in which property is publicly owned, and individuals are paid according to abilities and needs. As a Democratic Socialist, Sen. Bernie Sanders talks about Medicare-for-all health care, and Mamdani talks about rent freezes and childcare supports, not the U.S. takeover of Venezuelan oil fields from a vassal state that Trump has orchestrated.

As a recent MS-NOW op-ed notes, while political parties always target the opposition’s most extreme positions, the word “Communist” does not even speak to generations of voters born long after the Cold War and do not see it as a haunting specter.

It is Trump who openly admires Russia’s Vladimir Putin, China’s Xi Jinping, North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, actual communists, who have pursued systematic adaptations over decades to open their economies, if not their government, to more capitalistic enterprise. Trump covets their authoritarian, centralized power – a direct result of Communist ideology as it has been practiced  in the real world.

It is Trump who has demanded financial interest for the government from steel and tech companies looking for favorable regulation from him; that is right out of the Communist playbook. And it is Trump who is seeking the silence of comedians and news broadcasters who air criticism of him.

Trump’s ‘Choice’

In recent years, polls show a declining approval of capitalism and slowly rising approval of whatever is being lumped into the socialism label.  As always, answers depend on who’s asking and how they are asking and may have little to do with the outcome of specific election races.

And, as always, there is inherent danger into accepting any label as universal or all-explanatory. We all might vote “yes” on eliminating singular political labels that mean little.

But make no mistake. Trump sees the rise of even a few Democratic Socialists as nearly fatal to the country – even as the practical effect may be for an incoming Democratic House Speaker Hakim Jeffries to keep his Democratic House coalition united through a variety of issues, including on war aid in the Middle East.

“The communists elected in New York City recently want to completely destroy the traditional American way of life.” Communism “destroys everything,” Trump said, adding, “It’s happening right now in New York and California. You’ll live in squalor. There will be no food; there will be no housing; there will be no military; there will be no law and order; there will be no nothing. There will be no nothing. You’ll be a third world inhabitant in every way, and everyone will suffer or die.”

According to Trump, “assassinations of those who oppose them is a very important element of their ideology.” He demanded that we choose between “patriotism” and “hardcore godless communists.”

If that’s the choice Trump invites, I’m ready to vote.

Image at top courtesy of Alexander Popadin via Pexels. 

“FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IS NOT JUST IMPORTANT TO DEMOCRACY, IT IS DEMOCRACY.” – Walter Cronkite. CLICK HERE to donate in support of our free and independent voice.

The post Trump’s ‘Communist’ Label appeared first on DCReport.org.

You have hopefully by now read the Atlantic cover story The End of Reading. It says more or less exactly that: Americans are reading much, much less than they used to. We actually take in more words than we used to, thanks to algorithmic social media and doing everything on our smartphones, but actually reading things like books or even full magazine articles or news stories has become rarer and rarer.

The story contains many troubling anecdotes: The Harvard undergraduate who complained about a book written in Old English, and had to use Chat GPT to translate it; the book was A Clockwork Orange, written in 1962. The three-year-old who started preschool and cried every day for weeks — not for her mother, but for her tablet. It also contains some observations I haven’t seen as well-articulated anywhere else: That writing transformed the human brain and our consciousness, allowing for logic, rationality, analytical thought, deduction, complexity, and focus. This anecdote particularly stands out:

Subscribe now

Ong cited case studies by the neuropsychologist Alexander Luria, who traveled to remote villages in Uzbekistan and Kirghizia in the 1930s, when peasants were starting to receive rudimentary reading and writing instruction. Luria met his subjects at teahouses, in field camps, and around evening fires. There, he posed a number of questions designed to elucidate differences in how illiterate and literate peasants thought. Luria told the peasants: “In the Far North, all bears are white. Novaya Zemlya is in the Far North.” He then asked them the color of bears in Novaya Zemlya. The literate peasants were able to complete the syllogism. But the illiterate ones refused to try, explaining that they had never been to the north and thus couldn’t answer. Achieving literacy seemed to have conveyed an ability to think logically and abstractly, not simply to read words.

Without reading and writing, the Atlantic piece argues, we wouldn’t have “philosophy, modern science, history as an academic enterprise, art criticism.”

Reading — really reading, and mucking through complex ideas, not just being spoon-fed single-sentence directives on social media or by AI — sharpens the mind and allows us to develop more complex cognition. Not reading, or decreasing how much we’re reading, allows those skills to atrophy, or never develop in the first place. Our current reality of social media outrage-baiting, easy-to-digest short-form videos, communication via text, reliance on AI to solve every-day problems (“using these ingredients, tell me what to make for dinner;” “make me a work-out plan for this week”), TV shows that have changed to meet our attention deficits — all of this adds up to brains that are more distracted but less engaged. We are more stimulated but less challenged.

This has political consequences.

Read more

I like Thom Hartmann. I do. Despite having spent time on RT (Russia Today) before wisely leaving the Kremlin’s shitty propaganda network, Hartmann is unapologetically progressive without spending all of his time trying to keep Republicans in power. Unlike, for instance, Cenk Uygur and The Young Turks, a group of “progressives” who are openly opposed to the progressive agenda if it helps minorities and women and the homeless and the Trans community and and and.

One of the things I like most about Hartmann is that he focuses on wealth inequality, but not in a way that throws marginalized communities under the bus. Usually. There are other times, however, where he has a bit of a blind spot for who and what the American right wing really is.

Thank the gods he doesn’t take the alt-left position that our tent is so wide, we should have room for literal Nazis and other assorted monsters as long as they’re pro-universal healthcare. That is a core tenet of the liars who call themselves “progressives” and then go against everything actual progressives advocate for.

Hartmann does not do that. He does, however, think that if Republican voters could just see through right-wing propaganda, they would totally be on our side:

The entire con depends on voters on the right never turning around and realizing they’re mourning the same identical loss that progressive Democrats are trying so hard to repair.

The instant working people stop asking “who’s the enemy who looks, prays, or loves differently than I do” and start asking “who took my dad’s paycheck,” the whole game is over.

That’s the one conversation the billionaires and their bought-off lickspittle politicians are truly terrified of.

So have it. Have it at the summer picnic with your MAGA brother-in-law and your progressive niece sitting side by side, and watch what happens when you skip the slogans and ask them both what kind of country they actually want to live in.

You’ll find (outside of the unrepentant and largely unreachable racists) that they want the very same America back, the one where an honest week’s work bought a decent life.

And I get it. It seems like a really obvious truth. Right-wing voters, especially the poor and working class, are being fucked non-stop by the policies they vote for. Every year, they get a little bit poorer. Every year, a little bit more economically insecure. Every year, a hell of a lot angrier.

We all know why this is happening. Billionaires are looting the country, and the Republican Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of Billionaire, Inc. The people screaming the loudest about being abandoned and ignored by the system are right-wing voters. They want economic justice! They want jobs! They want schools and roads and hospitals! They want a future! Our lives are a pile of shit, and we want something better!

Then they vote for the party who explicilty tells them that they’re going to cut taxes for the rich, kill millions of jobs, and close down their schools and hospitals. And take away their future.

Now, Hartmann believes this is because they’ve been conned by culture war issues in order to ignore the class war the rich have been waging on us for generations. It’s a really tempting narrative. It means that millions of Americans are just one revelation away from joining us in moving this country forward in leaps and bounds. If we can JUST reach them, everything will change.

But, I’m sorry Thom, that is just not going to fucking happen. Ever. I’d love to believe it could, but even though I will work to manifest a future where Republicans and ICE and CBP and the billionaires funding it all are dragged before tribunals and sentenced to life in prison or the gallows, I cannot engage in pure fantasy.

The cold, hard, and deeply depressing truth is that Republican voters are not being conned. Not really. For a con to be a con, you have to be unaware that you’re being lied to and manipulated. That simply is not the case here.

Republican voters know they’re being lied to. They know they’re being manipulated. They know the culture war stuff is bullshit. Obama’s tan suit? Hunter Biden’s laptop? Hillary’s secret pedophile sex dungeon? They know none of that was real or mattered. Republican voters know children are not getting sex change operations at school. They know Haitians are not eating cats and dogs. They know Central American drug gangs are not lurking around every corner.

Republican voters fucking know this is all bullshit or wild exaggerations. Their fuckwit of a Vice President literally told them he was making shit up: “Mr. Vance, who amplified false claims that Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, were eating pets, said he was willing “to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention.”

I know we all love to joke about how stupid MAGA is, and it’s true. They are willing to say the dumbest shit imaginable and insist it’s factual, no matter what the reality is. But a lot of that is performative nonsense. It’s an act. It’s a show of fealty to their tribe. It tells them that they belong and gives them permission to hate and oppress the people they fear.

Because the very foundation of who these people are is nothing more than fear and hate, and they goddamn well know it. These are the mediocre, racist white people who see every minority as a threat to the unearned privilege that keeps them in power. It doesn’t matter if it’s social, cultural, or economic power. They all respond the same way: With hate and rage at any minority that challenges their domination.

Black and Latino voters will vote for Black and Latino candidates. Not enough of those candidates will be champions of white supremacy.

Women have an annoying habit of not voting for misogyny and rape culture. How is THAT fair to mediocre white men? Won't someone think of THEIR needs?!

Muslims and Jews and atheists tend to vote for people who won’t force Christianity on them. But without JAY-zus, how will mediocre racist white people justify oppressing The Gays and stripping women of their reproductive rights?

Republican voters know full well that their party of pedophiles and traitors and grifters does not represent their economic needs. But at the same time Republicans are emptying the national treasure into the bank accounts of billionaires and their buddies, they will abuse their power to crush everyone the right hates.

They will pass laws targeting Trans kids. All 1% of the population of them.

They will pass laws turning women into breeding cattle to be disposed of at will.

They will pass laws making protests against fascism a crime.

They will pass laws making it legal to kill anyone as long as you are white and can pretend you were afraid.

They will pass laws stripping black voters of their rights.

They will pass laws to put Latino children in cages.

Republican voters see this, and they celebrate. The black empty void where their souls should be rejoices at the cruelty and violence and evil. They’ll tell themselves they’re the heroes of the story, but they don’t really care one way or another. As long as Those People suffer, Republicans can do literally anything.

Exaggeration? Cool. Riddle me this, then: The right spent years, fucking YEARS!, screaming their rage at the global cabal of pedophiles they KNEW for a fact existed. They thought the cabal was comprised of Jews and Democrats and liberal elites. What happened when they discovered that the cabal was actually real and a lot of Republicans, including their beloved Dear Leader, were among the names of the child rapists?

Well…is it really THAT important to see all of the Epstein Files? Can we really hold the Trump regime accountable for not releasing all of them? Aren’t Democrats really just as bad anyway?

Sure, the press keeps telling us that MAGAland is furious about the Epstein Files. Are any of them willing to vote for a Democrat to get them released? Are any of them looking to put Republicans in prison for obstruction and cover-ups?

Motherfucker, please.

Republican voters will make a big show of outrage and then pull that lever for any name with an "R" next to it. All of their big sobby tears vanish in the blazing heat of the racism and misogyny that really gets them up and moving in the morning. It has been this way since before the Civil War, when a handful of mediocre, racist slave owners convinced hundreds of thousands of medicocre racist white men to die horrifically, just to preserve their place in the racial hierarchy.

Medicocre, racist white people have been dying for racism for generations. Our generation is watching rural America be ravaged by opioids, and we’ll never know how many Republican voters died of Covid to “own the libs.” Then they voted for the party that murdered their friends and loved ones with a smile on their face and song in their hearts. Why? Because Trump promised them white nationalism, and that was more important than a prosperous future for themselves or their children. They traded it all away to hurt the people they hate, even at the cost of their own financial security.

So when Thom Hartmann says all we have to do is convince Republican voters that the racism and bigotry and misogyny are a con, I don’t know what the fuck he’s talking about. The hate is not the con. The hate is the entire point.

I wish it weren’t true, but we can’t pretend it’s not. These people are lost to us. Forever? Maybe. Maybe not. But until the pain of wallowing in hate becomes intolerable, they will never abandon those who promise to feed their addiction. Our job is to either cut off their supply or make the cost so high, they give it up. Nothing else will ever make them stop. They love it too much to walk away. They’re willing to die and sacrifice their own children to get more, and that’s the ugly truth Hartmann doesn’t want to confront.

Trump has got himself in a pickle with the most difficult people in the world to deal with.

Trump announced today that Iran walked out of the negotiating room and said we want some changes to the ceasefire agreement. “I said we’re not going to make changes. You know, they’re professional negotiators.” He said this in a call to Fox and Friends, because Fox and Friends is where he does his diplomacy and his war planning. I’m sure they’re tuned into Fox News in Tehran. Of course they are.

Iran came back and said it was the United States that walked out of the Oman talks. “Interpretation against the text is not permissible,” said Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei. “Lying has become part of the U.S. administration’s behavioral pattern, and they have become addicted to it.”

The dude gets it, doesn’t he?

Iran hit a Cypriot-flagged ship on Sunday as it passed through the Strait close to the shores of Oman, a no-go area in the Strait for shipping, according to rules established by the Iranian regime, because they control the Strait of Hormuz. Trump fired back by striking what the Pentagon called “140 targets” along the coast of Iran. The Wall Street Journal reported that “the attacks, like previous rounds, were designed to degrade Iran’s ability to launch attacks on commercial vessels transiting the strait.”

Let me tell you what’s going on when the Pentagon deploys the word “degrade” to describe what they’re doing. They know that they don’t have enough bombs and missiles to destroy all the missile and drone emplacements along Iran’s coast on the Strait of Hormuz. This is a screenshot from Google maps of just one stretch of the 600 miles of Iran’s coast on the Gulf:

Here is another screenshot:

There are miles and miles more coastline of Iran along the Strait of Hormuz. It’s hard to see in these screenshots, but all those dark sqiggly areas inland from the Gulf are mountains. In both screenshots, all the lettering along the edge of the Gulf and slightly inland are the names of villages. There are people in those villages, buildings, and houses. The Iranian regime can move in and take over a house from a family and install a missile launcher in their living room overlooking the Gulf. The launcher will be invisible to any form of surveillance – U.S. aircraft, satellites, Reaper drones fixed with surveillance cameras. They can’t look through the roofs of buildings. In the mountains themselves, there are hundreds of caves that can contain missile and drone launchers. Hundreds. Miles and miles and miles of them. There are dozens of villages with thousands of houses that can be appropriated by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) and used to launch missiles at ships in the Gulf or even targets in Kuwait, Bahrain, the UAE, and Jordan, all of which were hit by Iran on Sunday during their half of the tit-for-tat missile barrage.

There never was a ceasefire. There were two pages of paper with a list of 14 agreements, or aims, or promises or whatever the hell they were. The pieces of paper allowed Trump to get oil and gas prices down temporarily, which was the aim of the negotiations that his real estate trust-funders held in Geneva with representatives of Iran. The whole thing was for show.

Let me tell you what the Iranians knew the whole time. They knew Trump is in trouble politically in the U.S. They watch every point by point drop of Trump’s approval in the domestic polls. They know right where he stands moment to moment. They read his insane rants filled with lies on Truth Social. They watched Trump’s new chairman of the Federal Reserve take office. They watched as the Fed did not cut interest rates because inflation is still too high. The Iranians know why U.S. inflation is high. It’s because of Trump’s tit-for-tat war with Iran.

Now, let’s play a game. You’re a leader in Iran, it doesn’t matter who – Khamenei Jr. or one of the militant generals who are said to have gained power within the IRGC and according to some reports are really running things in Iran. As a leader of Iran, what are you going to do?

If you saw the same videos on the news last night that I saw, you saw the deck of a U.S. destroyer, or maybe two of them, all lit up with a gigantic flash of fire. Do you know what that was? A cruise missile taking off. Let’s go back to the Iranian IRGC commander. He’s got CNN, just like you and I do. He saw the Tomahawk missiles blasting off. He can count. He probably has an office somewhere with guys at computer screens keeping a running record of how many cruise missiles we’ve fired, and how many of them we have left in our arsenal.

If you’re the IRGC guy, what would you do? Would you go back to the negotiating table – wherever the hell that is these days – and keep talking with the representatives of a man who has never abided by a treaty or kept a promise in his life? Or would you fire off a few more cheapie missiles and drones at U.S. targets in Kuwait and Jordan and Bahrain and take a couple of pot-shots at ships attempting to sail through the Strait of Hormuz, so Trump will get pissed and say “we’re going to hit them very hard” and waste more of his Tomahawk missiles?

It’s not a hard choice, is it? The choice is made easy for the Iranians by one Donald Trump who has a constant need to go on Fox News and his insane Truth Social account to brag about how tough he is, how strong our military is, how he has “obliterated” Iran’s navy and air forces and its defenses. Take a guess at who knows the truth about how much damage Trump’s tit-for-tat air war has done to Iran. Uhhh, maybe the Iranians themselves, who have spent the ceasefire, such as it was, rebuilding their missile and drone capability and repairing their launchers and resupplying all those caves along the Gulf with new missiles and new drones.

Are you getting a picture of how easy this is for Iran? Trump can bluster all he wants about how he is reimposing the blockade on Iran’s ports. He can go on Fox News and brag that he is the one who controls the Strait of Hormuz.

But do you know who controls it? The Iranian military. They live there. They built all the missile emplacements. They built the single Shahed drone that the Washington Post reported yesterday wiped out a command headquarters in Kuwait on the second day of the war, killing six Americans and wounding – get this – 400 more. The Post story is extraordinary. It goes into how the soldiers’ wounds were understated in communications with the military hospital in Landstuhl, Germany, causing the hospital to not be adequately prepared to receive the wounded. Wounds that were severe were listed as moderate. Wounds that were moderate were listed as minor. All the wounds were bad enough that the soldiers were being airlifted out of Kuwait thousands of miles away to Germany to be treated in a hospital. Hegseth lied about the soldiers’ wounds so the Pentagon would not have to report to the press how much damage had been done to the American military by Iran – on the second day of the war.

The Shahed drone that hit the building on the American base in Kuwait cost about $25,000. The first evacuation flight out of Kuwait carrying wounded soldiers to the military hospital in Germany cost that much just in fuel to get off the ground when the C-17 took off.

Tit-for-tat is exactly the kind of war Iran wants with the U.S. because it is so gravely and completely unbalanced. It costs the U.S. a million dollars each day just to wake up the sailors on the ships we have in the Indian Ocean and feed them breakfast. It costs millions of dollars a day just to keep our ships sailing around the Indian Ocean and the Gulf of Oman. It costs tens of millions of dollars to fire off a few Tomahawk missiles. It costs tens of millions of dollars for us to put enough U.S. fighter aircraft in the air to bomb and fire missiles at military targets along Iran’s Gulf coast. It costs many more millions of dollars for the missiles the jets fire and the bombs they drop.

It costs less than one million dollars for Iran to fire 40 Shahed drones at U.S. bases we have in Kuwait and the UAE and Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Who has the upper hand in Trump’s tit-for-tat war? I’ll give you a hint. It’s not the guy whose name begins with a “T” and ends with a “P” who the Iranians call the biggest liar they’ve ever dealt with.

Iran has been dealing with invaders of every stripe for about 3,000 years. Alexander and the Greeks came and went. The Arab armies invaded and before leaving, gave the Persians the Muslim faith. The Turks and Mongols came and went. The Americans came in 1953 with their CIA and overthrew the Iranian government and installed the Shah. The Iraqis did their best during eight years starting in 1980 before both sides gave up after suffering a combined one million casualties.

Now comes Donald Trump. Do you think the leadership in Iran is intimidated by a man wearing orange pancake makeup with confectioner’s hair who spends more time thinking about gold-leafing another piece of gimcrackery for the Oval Office and worrying about his ballroom and the reflecting pool and his ridiculous arch and now the front columns of the White House than he does thinking about his war?

Pray for the power of Trump’s ego. It’s driving him to lose his war with Iran, and they will ensure the tit-for-tat war goes on long enough to cost him the midterm elections. The Iranians have been at this game for centuries. They’re players. He’s a putz.

Give a gift subscription

Leave a comment

Share

Watching people claiming to be “progressives” spend days defending Graham Platner with Republican talking points was pretty fucking depressing. No, the Jews did not sabotage Platner. He did that himself. No, his victim didn’t have to come forward years ago to be credible. We on the left know for a fucking fact women sometimes take decades to talk about their trauma. No, Platner’s victim is not responsible for Platner coming over and raping her. Platner is responsible for not stopping when she said, “No.”

If your candidate is more important than your morality, you were always immoral. Go put on the red hat of hate and stop pretending you’re a good person.

Anywho! Lots to catch up on this week! Let’s turn back that clock and see what you missed.

Monday: Forecast for this week - Peak White Victimization Complex

Tuesday: White Nationalism is all they know.

Wednesday: Recording and editing and writing!

Thursday: Podcast!

Also Thursday: Masterful gambit, Trump! This will definitely win you the midterms!

Friday: Dungeons & Dragons scripting and cleaning.

5 Things I Found Interesting This Week

The Hartmann Report

They're Shocked We Won't Pretend Anymore

The “partisan split” of Americans showed up in a big way at Fourth of July celebrations and backyard barbecues last week, but the media, while noting or even complaining about it, rarely mentions exactly why it’s happening…

Read more

6 days ago · 3455 likes · 32 comments · Thom Hartmann

News from Underground

All You Had To Do Was Be Nice

Greetings from The Underground…

Read more

5 days ago · 43 likes · 21 comments · Evan Fields

Skeptical Sociopath

The Emasculation of Mark Rutte

Metaphorically speaking, Rutte is a bottom. He’s submissive, a serial groveler, and he seems to enjoy being slightly humiliated by those he calls ‘daddy’. I am not one to yuck anyone’s yum, but in this case, I absolutely will. Mark Rutte’s unbearable ass-kissing of Donald Trump is not only an embarrassment; it’s extremely dangerous. “Unbefitting” is the…

Read more

2 months ago · 5 likes · 1 comment · Skeptical Sociopath

DEFIANT Dispatches

The Make-A-Wish Presidency

Somewhere in America right now, a kid with a terminal illness is getting the best day of their life. A trip to Disney World. A locker room visit with their favorite team. A afternoon that costs some stranger money and asks for nothing back except a smile…

Read more

2 days ago · 16 likes · BrooklynDad_Defiant!