When I was a young teenager, changing diapers for my baby brother and on babysitting gigs, it was all cloth. I could change a sleepy baby’s cloth diaper in the dark, large safety pins and all. A couple of decades later when I was a parent, it was all disposable. What happened? Virginia Postrel tells the story in “Engineering the disposable diaper: Benjamin Spock told mothers in the mid-twentieth century to buy six dozen cloth diapers and a covered pail. Within a decade, both were obsolete” (Works in Progress, April 24, 2026).

Back in 1957, disposable diapers had about 1% of the diaper market. They were expensive, and mainly used for situation where diapers would need to be changed while travelling. Postrel takes up the story:

After buying Charmin Paper Company in 1957, Procter & Gamble began looking for ideas for new paper products.  Motivated by the less pleasant aspects of spending time with his new grandchild, the company’s director of exploratory development, Victor Mills, suggested disposable diapers. After analyzing existing products and conducting consumer research, P&G created a dedicated diaper research group.

The research this group conducted, like that of its successors and competitors, wasn’t glamorous. It didn’t advance basic science. It wasn’t even an obvious route to profit. (One percent of the market!) It was a high-stakes gamble that required solving difficult engineering problems. How that happened represents the kind of hidden progress that leads to everyday abundance.

P&G’s first design flopped. Tested in the extreme heat of a Dallas summer, the pleated absorbent pad with plastic pants made babies miserable and left them with heat rashes. Starting over, the group had a one piece diaper ready for testing in March 1959. With an improved rayon moisture barrier between the baby and the absorbent tissue wadding, the new diaper was softer and more comfortable. An initial test of 37,000 hand-assembled prototypes went well, with about two thirds of the parents deeming the disposables as good or better than cloth. The next step was mass production.

Designing one well-functioning disposable was hard enough. Turning out hundreds a minute was practically impossible. ‘I think it was the most complex production operation the company had ever faced’, an engineer recalled.

Eventually, the diaper team mastered the process. In December 1961, Pampers went on the market in Peoria, Illinois. Once again, the test failed. This time mothers liked the diapers. But the price was way too high for a single use item: ten cents a diaper, equivalent to about one dollar today. By contrast, diaper delivery services, which served about five percent of the market, charged no more than five cents a diaper. Home laundry costs ran to one or two cents.

Lowering the price of a diaper required much larger volumes. Aiming at about six cents a diaper, P&G engineers spent several years developing what Harvard Business School’s Michael E. Porter described as ‘a highly sophisticated block-long, continuous-process machine that could assemble diapers at speeds of up to a remarkable 400 a minute’. After successfully testing Pampers at 5.5 cents each, P&G began a national rollout in 1966. By 1973, disposables accounted for 42 percent of the US diaper market.

Other firms first entered the diaper market in the 1970s, and then left: Scott Paper, International Paper, Union Carbide, Johnson & Johnson. The competitor that did gain a foothold was Kimberley-Clark, the innovator who had created “Kleenex tissues and Kotex feminine pads … in the 1920s.” After a false start or two, the Huggies diaper, with elastic around the legs and an improved tape closure, swept into the diaper market. It cost 30% more, but for a lot of buyers, the premium price was worth it.

I love a good product development story, and Postrel has lots more details: how new absorbent materials made diapers slimmer over time, reducing logistics costs like storage, handing, and retail shelf space; the environment arguments about disposable vs. cloth diapers; disposable training pants that little ones could pull up by themselves; some well-chosen modern cultural references to disposable diapers; and more. Here, I’ll just offer three takeaways.

First, the creation of a workable disposable diaper, and then improving on that diaper, and being able to take it to mass production at an affordable cost, were all genuinely difficult tasks. The innovations took investment measured in time, money, and varied kinds of expertise. The time-path to disposable diapers having 95% of the diaper market took decades, with a number of failures along the way both within and across companies.

Second, a non-breakthrough innovation like disposable diapers may be nndervalued, in part because Americans take so much for granted that competitive companies will be trying to provide new and improved versions of so many products. But over time, the accumulaton of many such innovations makes day-to-day life so much easier. It’s an enormous benefit of living in a dynamic market-oriented economy that can also be nearly invisible.

Third, when new mothers are asked about the essential needs for their babies, they tend to focus on milk and diapers. But although diapers are affordable in the mass market, they aren’t cheap. I wrote a few years ago in “Some Economics of Diapers” (September 29, 2022) about what an author called a “leaky” part of the US social safety net, along with discussions of diaper “banks” and other methods of assuring that low-income parents and their babies have access to diapers.

The post History of the Disposable Diaper first appeared on Conversable Economist.

It’s time for some consequences.

Just a week after the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran, Trump referred to the war as an “excursion” for the first time and said that “Every single element of their military is gone. Their leadership is gone. There’s not a thing that’s not gone.” A day later, he claimed, “I think the war is very complete, pretty much.”

Trump has said so many conflicting things about the war on Iran that The Bulwark published a “war glossary” to try to keep up with his pronouncements. The war is an “excursion” that we’re “winning by a lot,” that will be over “soon,” and that “hostilities have been terminated,” so there is no need for the 60-day report to Congress demanded by the War Powers Act.

Sixty-five days after Trump and Hegseth launched their war, Iran has a stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz. Twenty percent of the world’s trade in oil is frozen, anchored in ships in the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean. When Trump announced “Project Freedom” on Sunday and promised to escort tankers and cargo ships through the Strait, Iran fired anti-ship missiles on two U.S. destroyers and started launching new drone and missile attacks on its neighbor, the United Arab Emirates.

Meanwhile, there has been no comment from the Pentagon on CNN’s recent report on the U.S. bases that were destroyed early in the war and that have been largely abandoned. Nobody knows why Iran was able to destroy two U.S. AWACS aircraft that were sitting on runways in Saudi Arabia. Nobody has explained why a U.S. Naval headquarters building in Bahrain was destroyed, or why a complex of radar domes in Kuwait were so damaged, they are unusable. The war room at the U.S. airbase in Qatar was hit and has been unoccupied since early in the war. CNN reported that in all, Iran was able to severely damage 16 U.S. military facilities in eight countries in the Gulf region.

So, with no war room in Qatar, with no radar facilities in Kuwait, with no naval headquarters in Bahrain, how is what is left of our war on Iran being run, and by whom?

No answer to that at the Pentagon today, where Hegseth held a press conference standing next to General Dan Caine, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who is looking more and more like a handy prop for Hegseth and less like the Pentagon’s chief military officer.

How easy it is to forget that it was just last year that Hegseth faced questioning at his confirmation hearing about the sexual assault charges that were made against him in Monterey, California in 2017 by a woman who was a participant at a conference of Republican women at which Hegseth was the keynote speaker. I went back and re-read the reports of the incident. Hegseth met the woman, described as a wife and mother who was staying at the Monterey hotel with her husband and children, in a bar at the hotel after his speech. Around 1 a.m., there were complaints of a disturbance at the hotel pool. Security guards who responded found a drunk Hegseth and the woman. Hegseth started screaming that he “had freedom of speech” and had to be restrained by the woman, according to a police report filed later. The woman explained to the security guard that “they were Republicans” and apologized for Hegseth’s behavior.

Later, Hegseth took her to his hotel room and blocked the door with his body so she could not leave. The woman told the police that the last thing she could remember was Hegseth being on top of her with his “dogtags dangling in her face.”

Vice President Vance had to break a 50-50 tie vote in the Senate to secure Hegseth’s confirmation for the post that was then still called Secretary of Defense.

Last week, Hegseth faced congressional questioning about having his former attorney, Timothy Parlatore, serving as a “senior advisor” to him in the Pentagon at the same time he is still representing clients in private practice. Hegseth refused to answer a direct question from Representative Jason Crow about whether Parlatore has a top-secret security clearance, since he accompanies Hegseth to classified briefings and travels with Hegseth to highly classified military bases and facilities.

Nobody asked Hegseth how much he paid Parlatore when he was the lawyer who represented him during a police investigation of the sexual assault claim by the woman in Monterey. Parlatore was also Hegseth’s lawyer when he reached a settlement with the woman who had threatened to sue him for sexual assault. Hegseth paid the woman $50,000. Parlatore attempted to get the police sexual assault investigation report sealed, but was refused, because Hegseth himself had previously requested that the report be emailed to him, negating the privacy laws in California.

Hegseth has fired 24 generals and senior commanders in the military. None of the generals or commanders had any negative performance related reviews against them, nor had any of the generals been accused of sexual harassment or assault. Sixty percent of the generals whom Hegseth fired were women or Black.

So, let’s review. Pete Hegseth has been in charge of Trump’s war on Iran for more than two months. Iran, while accepting a ceasefire offered by Trump that they didn’t even request, has resisted all attempts at a peace agreement, demanding that its control of the Strait of Hormuz and its highly enriched uranium are off the table.

Meanwhile, the world is being starved of the oil that remains bottled up in the Persian Gulf, with gas prices skyrocketing, gas rationing being ordered in some countries, and petroleum-based fertilizers produced by Gulf countries in short supply around the world. Experts have made estimates that if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed for much longer, the lack of fertilizer will begin to affect food supplies.

Why does Pete Hegseth still have his job? Because he works for a deranged man who only three days ago was bragging about being able to identify a squirrel in a cognitive test that he claims was overseen by “a board of doctors.”

This country elected a sex-criminal as president who appointed a sexual abuser to be in charge of the U.S. military. They started a war that they cannot win. We are getting exactly what our fellow Americans in the Republican Party voted for.

Late breaking news update: Axios is reporting that Trump has cancelled “Project Freedom,” the operation to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz, because of “progress” in negotiations with Iran. The blockade by both Iran and the U.S. of the Strait of Hormuz remains in full effect, with no ships allowed to pass in and out of the Persian Gulf.

I don’t know what the hell this means, other than Trump doesn’t want to look weak, and he has do something, and this spastic craziness is it. He wants to save face somehow. It ain’t gonna happen. He and Hegseth have lost their war, and Iran knows it.

Leave a comment

Share

Give a gift subscription

If you’ve ever been offered “no interest” financing at checkout, whether for medical care, home improvement, or a retail purchase, then you’re not alone because it’s become a common occurrence. These offers are everywhere, and on the surface, they sound like a smart way to spread out payments without paying extra, so you might be tempted to go for it, but there’s a detail buried in the fine print that many consumers miss, which is deferred interest.

Deferred interest is one of the most misunderstood financing structures out there. And if you don’t fully understand how it works, it can end up costing you a lot more than you ever expected.

In this article, we’ll look at exactly what you’re getting into before you sign.

What Is Deferred Interest?

Deferred interest is a type of financing where interest is temporarily put on hold , usually only for a promotional period such as  6, 12, or 18 months.

During that time, you’re told you won’t pay interest. Basically, that’s true but only if you meet the terms. Interest is still being calculated in the background from day one. It’s just not added to your balance yet.

If you pay off the entire balance before the promotional period ends, you avoid paying that interest entirely. But if even a small portion of the balance remains, all the accumulated interest gets added back onto your account, but can cause you financial problems that you might not have counted on paying.

Why It’s Easy to Misunderstand

The phrase “no interest” creates a sense of safety that really doesn’t exist. It sounds similar to a traditional zero-percent APR credit card, but deferred interest is not the same thing.

With a true 0% APR offer, interest simply doesn’t exist during the promotional period. However, with deferred interest, it’s more like a ticking clock in the background because the interest remains.

Many consumers assume that making minimum payments is enough to stay on track. In reality, minimum payments are rarely structured to fully pay off the balance before the deadline, so you’ll be stuck with paying interest. That misunderstanding can lead to a surprise bill that’s much higher than you probably expected.

How the Costs Add Up

Let’s say you finance $3,000 with a 12-month deferred interest plan.

You make your monthly payments on time, but by the end of the promotional period, you still have $200 left to be paid even though you’ve made the payments.

Instead of just paying off the remaining balance, you now owe all the interest that  has accumulated over the full 12 months, often at rates exceeding 20%. That could add hundreds of dollars to your total cost overnight.

When the interest takes effect retroactively, it doesn’t matter how close you were to paying it off. Missing the payoff by even a small amount will trigger the full interest charge to be launched.

Where Deferred Interest Is Often Used

Deferred interest financing shows up in a wide range of industries such as the following:

• Healthcare and dental procedures
• Cosmetic treatments
• Furniture and appliance purchases
• Electronics and retail stores
• Home improvement projects

In many cases, it’s presented as a convenient solution to make large purchases more manageable.

And to be fair, it can be, but only if you fully understand the terms and plan your payments carefully to avoid the interest.

Why Companies Use Deferred Interest

From a business perspective, deferred interest is an effective way to increase conversions. Offering financing removes the immediate barrier  of a large upfront cost. It allows customers to say “yes” to purchases they might otherwise delay or decline.

The structure of deferred interest means that lenders still have a strong chance of earning interest revenue, especially if consumers don’t pay off the balance in time.

It’s a model that benefits businesses, but it places the responsibility squarely on the consumer to manage the risk to the best of their ability.

Fine Print Matters

One of the biggest issues with deferred interest plans is how the terms are disclosed.

Important details, like when interest starts accruing, how it’s calculated, and what triggers it, are often buried in dense contract language that’s hard for a person to decipher.

Consumers may not realize:

• Interest accrues from the purchase date and not after the promo period
• Minimum payments don’t guarantee payoff in time
• A single late payment can void promotional terms
• The interest rate may be significantly higher than standard credit cards

These aren’t small details, but the difference between saving money and paying a premium.

How to Protect Yourself

Deferred interest isn’t inherently bad. It just requires a more strategic approach.

If you’re considering this type of financing, here are a few ways to protect yourself:

Know the Exact Payoff Date

Don’t estimate. Instead, get the exact date when the promotional period ends and work backward from there.

Calculate Your Monthly Payment

Divide the total balance by the number of months in the promo period. That’s your target payment, and not the minimum payment listed on your statement.

Set Up Automatic Payments

Missing a payment could cancel your promotional terms, so it’s imperative that you make your payments on time.

Pay It Off Early If Possible

The sooner you eliminate the balance, the less risk you carry.

Alternatives Worth Considering

Depending on your situation, there may be better financing options available.

These include things like:

• True 0% APR credit cards (without deferred interest)
• Personal loans with fixed interest rates
• Transparent payment plans with no retroactive charges

Some financing providers are also working to make terms clearer and more consumer-friendly, by focusing on simple interest rather than deferred interest rate structures.

Exploring these alternatives can help you avoid surprises and choose a plan that aligns effectively with your financial goals.

Why Transparency Matters

As more consumers become aware of how deferred interest works, there’s a distinct growing demand for clearer, more transparent financing options.

Regulators and consumer advocates have raised concerns  about how these plans are marketed, especially when key terms aren’t clearly communicated so there are a lot of gray areas.

At the same time, financial literacy is improving because people are asking better questions and taking a closer look at the details before committing to the loan.

That shift is important. Because when consumers understand the rules, they’re in a much stronger position to make informed decisions and avoid interest.

Final Thoughts

Deferred interest financing can be a useful tool, but only if you go into it with a clear understanding of how it works.The biggest mistake isn’t using it, but it’s  assuming it’s something it’s not.

Before you agree to any financing plan, take a few extra minutes to review the terms, calculate your payments, and consider your options. That small amount of effort can save you a significant amount of money. Because in the end, the goal isn’t just to make a purchase more affordable today, but to ensure it stays affordable in the future.

Photo: RDNE Stock project via Pexels

CLICK HERE TO DONATE IN SUPPORT OF DCREPORT’S NONPROFIT MISSION

The post The Hidden Costs of Deferred Interest: What Consumers Need to Know appeared first on DCReport.org.

Please support this work by becoming a paying subscriber. This newsletter is free and will always remain free, but it still takes time and effort to produce. Your support means everything to me. For just $5 a month or $50 a year (a 17% discount!), you can keep the Opinionated Ogre going. Thank you!

🌊Join The Blue Wave!🌊

Click here for a PayPal donation!

Once upon a time, the pro-life movement liked to pretend that they cared about “states’ rights.” That they only wanted to end Roe v Wade so they could get the federal government out of the way of good god-fearing Christian red states. Then the good people of America could decide for themselves if they wanted to allow women to brutally murder babies make their own choices concerning their sinful whorish ways bodily autonomy.

But we all knew that was a fucking lie. We knew that “pro-life” zealots didn’t care about the unborn. They cared about murdering women. As many as possible. They’re a death cult. They’ve always been a death cult. They cheered when their handpicked murderers struck down Roe, but that was then; this is now.

Now, they want more death, and Trump isn’t delivering it fast enough to sate their psychotic bloodlust:

“Trump is the problem. The president is the problem,” Dannenfelser told the Wall Street Journal in a striking intervention from a woman who once led Trump’s pro-life ground game.

In an address to donors at her group’s gala in D.C. on Wednesday, the Journal reported, Dannenfelser warned that if Republicans keep allowing individual states to decide abortion policy, “then the movement as we know it is finished.”

The problem is twofold. The first is that women can still access Mifepristone, the abortion pill. Because Republicans have made it all but impossible to get an abortion in a hospital or a clinic, more women than ever are turning to abortions using the pill. That’s caused an overall increase in abortions because fewer women are trying to jump through the GOP’s hoops and going straight to abortion through the mail.

Ah…unintended consequences. Fucking idiots.

The second problem is exactly what Dannenfelser “warned” her fellow death cultists about. Individual states, i.e., blue states where Democrats still respect civil rights, continue to allow women to decide their own destiny. The fucking nerve of them!

But, again, we always knew this was coming. When the right talks about “freedom” and “choice,” what they mean is the freedom and choice to dictate how you live your life. This is a foundational part of America’s right wing. They cry about oppression when others are given the rights they’ve enjoyed all along. Equality is anathema to a Republican. They only feel free when they have their boot on the neck of the people they hate.

I promise you, if Dannenfelser or her daughters were faced with a fatal ectopic pregnancy, she would not pray to JAY-zus for salvation and a miracle. She would get that abortion in a fucking fetal heartbeat. Because why should she or her loved ones die? That’s crazy! But you and your daughters? Well, that’s too fucking bad. You should have thought of the consequences before spreading your legs, you whores. Oh, you’re married with four kids, and you want to have more? Well, it’s God’s will for you to die, sweetie. Too bad. Now, excuse me while my children and I continue to receive proper healthcare.

Salvation for me, not for thee. It’s the Christofascist way.

Trump has not put a lot of effort into pandering to the pro-life movement since “winning” the 2024 election. Not because he doesn’t want the Evangelical death cult on his side, but because he doesn’t give a shit about abortion. He never did. Trump literally does not give a second thought to women’s reproductive rights. It’s a meaningless topic for him. If his base was pro-abortion, he would be pro-abortion. If his base was pro-abortion until the second trimester, that’s what he would back. He doesn’t care at all. Trump is a misogynist to the bone, but not in this particular way. He’ll happily watch women die because of his policies, but he won’t put in the time and energy to restrict their rights further because what a woman does or doesn’t do with her body doesn’t affect him, personally.

And that is what it’s always about with Trump: How do I benefit from this, or how does it hurt me? If it doesn’t, then why bother?

Did you know the Opinionated Ogre has a weekly podcast? It’s true! New episodes every Thursday! Catch the latest episode here:

Join The Ogre Nation Conversation!

Trump got the Evangelical vote. It got him back into power. They still overwhelmingly support him because abortion is illegal in wide swathes of the country. It will be a very long time before the rank and file death cult tires of women bleeding to death in hospital parking lots. The leaders want more, but Trump isn’t going to pay much attention to them until they persuade enough of the base to stop supporting him. And so Dannenfelser has learned the lesson so many have learned before: She was not using Trump. Trump was using her, and now he doesn’t need her anymore.

That doesn’t mean abortion access is safe. The Republican-controlled Supreme Court is infinitely corrupt and will, without a doubt, eventually “discover” a new legal justification for banning abortion nationwide, rejecting their own reasoning about letting states decide for themselves.

Trump will certainly take credit for that, unless he sees it hurting him in the polls. Then he’ll throw his own Justices under the bus, denouncing them as “too extreme.” Trump has no ideology beyond “Me.” We all know this.

It is, however, very helpful of Dannenfelser and her fellow soulless monsters to so openly clarify who and what they are. No more pretending they care about states’ rights and freedom and choice. They have dropped all pretense that they care about anything other than a nationwide abortion ban and spreading as much death and misery as possible. We can dispense with the veneer of respectability the legacy press has allowed these murderers to hide behind for decades and hold them up as the death cult we’ve known to be all along.

It really does make the choice much clearer for the public going forward. Isn’t it nice when the Christofascists stop pretending to be anything other than sadistic animals?

I write to help you cope with the fear and anger threatening to overwhelm you every day. If this newsletter gets you through these dark times, please consider becoming a contributing supporter for only $5 a month or just $50 a year (a 17% discount!). Thank you for everything!

☠️This Subscription Kills Fascists☠️

Prefer a one-and-done tip? Click here!

There are only 181 days until the midterms, and the regime is panicking. They’re afraid of us. Keep making them afraid every single day. Remember, you are never alone. We beat the fascists once. We will fucking do it again.

These are dark times but I will continue to tell the stories you need to hear in a clear (and usually profane) voice. If I entertain/anger/inform you, preferably all three, please consider becoming a supporting subscriber today for only $5 a month or just $50 a year (a 17% discount!).

🔥Burn Fascism To The Ground!🔥

Click here to leave a one-time tip!

We need to have a conversation about racist mediocre white men. They’re a plague on this country, and they’re killing everything good in the world. They’ve become so dangerously toxic, there is a very real possibility they’ve doomed us to half a century (minimum!) of misery and death because they cannot bear the idea of being the mediocre nobodies they actually are. They HAVE to be special and powerful and in control, and if they’re not? Well, then everything has to burn to the ground. That’s what you get for not acknowledging how superior they are in their mediocrity.

I’ve been hearing a lot lately about a so-called “extinction burst.” This is the idea in psychology that when a toxic behavior is no longer rewarded, it intensifies in a desperate bid to restart the reward cycle. If that fails, the behavior dies out, aka, goes “extinct.”

This is supposed to be what we are seeing right now with racist, mediocre white men. Men who have nothing to offer but their rage and weaponized incompetence. They’re lashing out and destroying everything around them because they need to show the world they are actually mommy’s special little snowflake. They need to prove that they’re superior to all the mean dark-skinned people and cruel women and scary gays and even scarier trans people. To do that, racist, mediocre white men have gone all in on fascism and white nationalism. That’ll show those meanies who’s in charge!

Is it an extinction burst, though? Only if we make it one. Are we prepared to do that? Are we finally sick and tired enough of racist, mediocre white men to shut them down for good?

I was told the Tea Party was the last gasp of racist, mediocre white men. Then they elected the most racist, most mediocre white man on Earth. Their temper tantrum was rewarded.

I was told Trump’s first time in office was the last gasp of racist, mediocre white men. Then he stayed in the headlines for four years and “won” the 2024 election after building an even larger and more racist cult of mediocre white men.1 Rewarded yet again.

Now this fascist shithole regime is the last gasp of racist, mediocre white men. There’s always another “last gasp.” Always another “extinction burst.” The racist, mediocre white men always get another bite at the apple they’ve covered in shit and filth.

Until we say they don’t. Until we say, “Fuck you. No more of your bullshit. Sit your bitch ass down and shut the fuck up, spoiled little white man.”

We have to do this. We have to stop coddling racist, mediocre white men.

There are encouraging signs we are reaching/have reached a tipping point. A lot of women are being really blunt about who these men are:

Women have been speaking out about this for a very long time, but it’s reaching a crescendo. Women, especially younger women, are so absolutely fucking fed up with racist, mediocre white (and non-white) men that they’re just checking out. And since bisexuality is not nearly as frowned upon among women, they’re looking elsewhere for romantic and sexual fulfillment. Or they’re just going solo, and they’re fine with that because the alternative is garbage.

Men are left to fend for themselves or listen to fucking morons like this:

@lucasanswerNever Help With Chores!

Tiktok failed to load.

Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser

Look at this fucking loser. Listen to his advice for racist, mediocre white men. Don’t be a partner. Don’t cook or clean or participate in any way in being in a relationship. She’s either your domestic servant or you are hers. Listen to that advice and then ask yourself what women would ever put up with that shit? None I know.

Then men have the fucking gall to cry and whine and rage about a loneliness epidemic? Why won’t women date me? Why won’t they have sex with me? Why do women prefer to be alone? Are you shitting me? Have you MET a woman in the real world? Women are horny as fuck. They WANT to get laid as much as men do. What they don’t want is a penis attached to a loser who thinks women exist for his pleasure and nothing else.

No one is forcing men to follow the path of the incel. No one is forcing them to be lazy slobs who think the only emotions worth showing are anger and lust. Is it easier? Sure. Is it working? Obviously not. Men are falling behind, and they’re not getting laid, and they’re not getting married. Even when men put the effort in to look good and be successful, too many of them do it for the wrong reasons, imagining that toxic masculinity and dominating women will make them attractive partners. Imagine their surprise when all they attract are women who don’t give a shit about them personally, but rather view them the same way they view women: A means to an end. How emotionally fulfilling. 🙄🙄🙄

Sure, they’re having sex, but it’s JUST sex. Sooner or later, the emptiness of that life will eat away at their souls and leave behind the bitter resentment etched into the faces of hollow men like Elon Musk and Donald Trump. I’ve been with Mrs. Ogre since 1997, and I promise you, I’m a thousand times happier and more fulfilled than the “manly men” who have slept with 500 women and wake up every morning to an empty bed.

But back to the main point: With each “last gasp,” the racist, mediocre white men of America become more and more extreme and unfuckable. They become louder and stupider and more obnoxious. They’re not even bothering to pretend to be decent human beings anymore.

They decided that the best way to show America they deserved to be in charge was to go full Nazi.

You never go full Nazi. Ain’t no American woman ever got turned on by a goose-stepping fascist screaming about how Jews need to die, women need to submit to his authority, and 14-year-old girls should have his white babies.

But here we are, anyway. The final extinction burst. Because after this, we either make the racist, mediocre white men pay such a steep price for their arrogance that they grow the fuck up, or we are lost as a nation for a generation or two (or three).

And that really is what we’re talking about: Making racist, mediocre white men grow the fuck up. I’ve written about this more than once over the years, and it really does seem to be penetrating.2 We have coddled these manbabies for literally centuries, and the only way forward is to stop. Stop the coddling. Stop them. Stop all of it.

When the regime falls, and it will, the chorus of enablers will be deafening. They will insist we have to “look forward” and “join hands to heal the nation.” What they’re actually telling us is to reward the temper tantrum yet again by not holding racist, mediocre white men accountable for their actions, just like we’ve been doing for over two hundred years.

But spoiled children never learn unless there are consequences for their actions, and it has to be more than a slap on the wrist. These screaming toddlers have to learn to fear the cost of trying to destroy America. They have to look around at their fellow fascists and see them spending decades in prison or swinging from the gallows for the crimes they’ve committed. The racist, mediocre white men who fancy themselves the masters of all have to learn they are masters of nothing because they were only ever mediocre nobodies. Their only power was being white, angry, and stupid in a country that refused to hold them responsible for anything, ever. Take that away, and they are left with the choice to do better or slink off into the background, never to be heard from again.

I’m ready to kick this plague of losers to the curb and reclaim our future from the dumbest, angriest fucksticks America has ever produced. My kids and hypothetical grandkids deserve better.

I hope you feel better informed about the world and ready to kick fascists in the teeth to protect it. This newsletter exists because of you, so please consider becoming a supporting subscriber today for only $5 a month or just $50 a year (a 17% discount!). Thank you for everything!

🖕FUCK THE PATRIARCHY!🖕

Click here for a PayPal donation!

There are 182 days until the most important midterm election in American history. The regime is afraid, and they should be. We are legion, and they are weak. Stay strong. You are never alone.

More than a decade ago, I was reporting in Brazil about the country’s strict abortion ban. I interviewed a doctor who had been excommunicated from the Catholic Church for providing an abortion to a nine-year-old rape victim — he was threatened and protested, and the girl herself had to be smuggled past vicious anti-abortion protesters to even get into the hospital. I talked to a young woman who, pregnant and desperate, told doctors she had been raped so that she could get a safe and legal abortion. While Brazil criminalizes abortion, the state also forced its will women who chose to have babies — for example, by forcing women into C-sections under threat of criminal penalty — and allowing for the widespread abuse of birthing women. “It's part of Catholic culture that this experience of childbirth should come with humiliation,” one doctor told me.

Subscribe now

The abortion rights legal landscape, like the landscape for reproductive rights more broadly, was pretty abysmal. But some one million women were still having abortions in Brazil every year. And they were doing so largely thanks to abortion pills.

This is true all over the world where abortion is banned. I’ve reported many times on the proliferation of abortion pills, which women manage to get on far-flung Indonesian islands, in conservative pockets of Pakistan, in Bangladeshi refugee camps, in rural Kenyan villages. Abortion pills have been legal in parts of Europe since the late 1980s. In Latin America, where abortion was long criminalized across most of the continent, women began noticing that the ulcer medicine Cytotec came in interesting packaging, with a little symbol of a pregnant woman with a red line drawn over her and a strongly-worded warning not to take while pregnant. Well. Lots of women began turning up at pharmacies complaining of ulcers.

Nothing has changed abortion access as profoundly as abortion pills, which in the US are typically a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, and in places where abortion is banned are often misoprostol alone. Before misoprostol, abortion in countries where the procedure was outlawed mostly looked like it did in America’s pre-Roe days: The wealthiest and most well-connected women might be able to travel overseas to end a pregnancy; others might be lucky enough to find a kind and well-trained albeit illegal provider; but many went to scammers and dangerous charlatans, or tried to take mattes into their own hands. In America, the symbol of abortion’s Bad Old Days is the coat hanger. In sub-Saharan Africa, where I’ve reported for many years on abortion access, it might be the sharp stick.

Subscribe now

Predictably, this killed a lot of women. Some 70,000 women were dying every year from unsafe abortions, almost entirely in countries where the procedure was outlawed. Five million more were seriously injured year after year after year. And each year, roughly 220,000 children were left motherless. As you might imagine, unsafe abortion was one of the top drivers of maternal mortality worldwide.

Today, deaths from unsafe abortion number closer to 29,000, a nearly 60 percent decrease from 2009. This is still horrific, and these deaths would be near zero if all women worldwide had legal access to safe abortion care. But cutting unsafe abortion deaths by more than half is a huge achievement. It’s worth noting that the global maternal mortality rate has decreased by 40 percent from 2000. In other words, unsafe abortions decreased at a much faster pace, in a shorter period of time, than pregnancy-related deaths generally. Something about abortion changed.

Read more