Crusading against evil since ...
2969 stories
·
1 follower

Donald Trump plans to pocket billions from the gonzo crypto scam he’s running out of the Oval Office

1 Comment
Donald Trump to reportedly unveil Bitcoin reserve strategy at White House  crypto summit

Let’s say you and I and every bank robber serving time in federal prison and every con artist behind bars for fleecing suckers out of their life savings and every Bernie Madoff-style-Ponzi schemer and every Mafia don who ever blackmailed a bodega owner or ran a crooked dice game – let’s say we all got together in a room and tried to come up with a brand new scam to rip people off and separate people from their money…and get away with it free and clear.

I’m here to tell you that even with all that criminal talent, we couldn’t come up with a masterpiece of thievery that compares to what Donald Trump and his family are running right now, today, out of the White House. Our President, the one 77 million of our fellow citizens voted for and put in the Oval Office for another four years, the one who told the Atlantic earlier this week that “I run the world,” has decided that he will spend his time in office fleecing that world of every dollar and nickel and dime he can get, and he’s doing it with crypto.

It’s so complicated that you can barely wrap your mind around it, and yet it’s so simple, not even Trump and his two dullard sons could fuck it up.

The New York Times published a story on Tuesday that makes a brave attempt at explaining how they’re doing it: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments, Presidential Policy Changes: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm. It’s written by three of the Times’ top investigative reporters, and it’s thick with details of shady foreign investors from dark corners of the money-world like Abu Dubai and the Cayman Islands and Hong Kong, and the reporters do their best to describe the whacko-crypto-Rube-Goldbergo thing called “World Liberty Financial” the Trump family has established to run their scam, and it’s so impenetrable, I guarantee your eyes will cross and then roll back into your head as you try to make sense of it.

This is what the New York Times is so good at: they get out there and make a record of who’s involved and how many times they’ve been indicted and how much time they’ve done in prison. Then they make the connections between the three card monte pasts of the crypto scammers and the Trump family in the White House, with Eric and Don Jr. flying around the world to Pakistan and the Emirates and taking meetings with Silicon Valley zillionaires and coming up with new scams like the pay-to-play crypto dinner Trump is planning to put on at one of his golf clubs for anyone…and I mean anyone…who spends some of their millions on a fucking meme coin called “$TRUMP” in order to be on the guest list.

The Times reports that World Liberty Financial – in reality, behind a very, very thin corporate veil, Donald Trump himself – made $550 million selling its first digital token, “$WLFI,” to a bunch of crypto scammers who recently settled cases brought against them by the Securities and Exchange Commission. At least one scammer, Justin Sun, the guy who bought the banana stuck to a wall with duct tape for $6 million, had his SEC case dropped, right after – you guessed it – he spent $75 million buying $WLFI “coins.”

And here’s the beauty part. I’m going to do my best to describe the scam the Times calls “partnerships” between the Trump company, World Liberty Financial, and other crypto firms. Here it is, in all its glory, and you tell me if this doesn’t sound like a crypto protection racket. The smaller crypto outfits agree to buy, say, $20 million to $30 million of World Liberty’s “coins” like $WLFI. The Trump company then agrees to buy a smaller amount of their crypto currency. This “investment” of World Liberty in the smaller crypto firms is supposed to give them credibility in the world of crypto, and for this generous endorsement, the Trump company gets to keep the difference between what the little guys spent on $WLFI, and what the Trumps spent on the little guys’ coins, amounting, according to the Times, to as much as a 20 percent premium. All of the specific details like names of the crypto firms and amounts they “invested” is kept confidential, so nobody in the greater world of crypto can discover how badly they’ve been taken to the cleaners.

Got that? You give me a quarter, all your lunch money, and not only do I promise not to beat the shit out of you with the SEC and DOJ and FTC and all the other regulatory and prosecutorial departments I control, I’ll even give you two dimes back and not tell anybody how I held you up.

And oh, by the way, buy a few million of my worthless crypto “coins” – of which I already own 80 percent of the world’s entire stock – and I’ll feed you some rubber chicken at my New Jersey golf club and give you a tour of the White House after hours.

Wow, what a deal.

There are other scams, because of course there are. Trump pardoned one guy who got convicted of violating banking laws with his crypto business. In return, he permitted the Trump company to buy some of his crypto currency at bargain basement prices. And then Trump turned around and announced the U.S. government will put its power and prestige behind a so-called “crypto reserve” that will store up a bunch of crypto currency just like it stores oil in “oil reserves” against a future shortage of that precious resource, and you’ll never guess whose crypto currency the U.S. government has chosen as one of the currencies it will store in its reserves, along with the grandfather of all crypto, Bitcoin. Yep. The crypto currency that Trump bought from the guy he pardoned, the value of which has now shot straight up like a rocket.

Remember how corrupt we thought Spiro Agnew was when it was revealed that after being elected Vice President, he continued to take cash from contractors he had extorted when he was governor of Maryland? Just the image of the Vice President reaching across his desk and physically accepting a paper bag full of twenty-dollar bills was enough to get him to resign in return for a plea bargain on a tax evasion charge that gave him no jail time.

How much do you figure Donald Trump will scam in crypto by the time he leaves office? The Times didn’t attempt an estimate of the amount he has made so far, but just running through the hundreds of millions and tens of millions mentioned in their story, along with the tens of millions in the stories that have been written about the pay-to-play golf club crypto dinner, he’s approaching a billion dollar take…after just 100 days.

It's no wonder he doesn’t give a shit about the damage to the world’s economy his tariffs have done. The only economy he cares about is the blue-smoke-and-mirrors illusion of crypto. Like his hair, nobody but him knows how much of it is real, or how the elaborate scam is held together, but it got him elected, and it’s going to make him richer than he ever dreamed.

Your support through paid subscriptions is what keeps this column going. If you haven’t already, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Give a gift subscription

Leave a comment

Share

Read the whole story
DGA51
7 hours ago
reply
Like his hair, nobody but him knows how much of it is real, or how the elaborate scam is held together, 
Central Pennsyltucky
Share this story
Delete

Bees, Fish, and Plants Reveal the Toll of Climate Change

1 Comment

The Conversation logo

Nature Is Being Disrupted in Two Accelerating and Alarming Ways

The problem with climate change isn’t just the temperature – it’s also how fast the climate is changing today.

Historically, Earth’s climate changes have generally happened over thousands to millions of years. Today, global temperatures are increasing by about 0.36 degrees Fahrenheit (0.2 degrees Celsius) per decade.

Imagine a car speeding up. Over time, human activities such as burning fossil fuels have increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. These gases trap heat from the Sun. This is like pressing the gas pedal. The faster the driver adds gas, the faster the car goes.

The 21st century has seen a dramatic acceleration in the rate of climate change, with global temperatures rising more than three times faster than in the previous century.

The faster pace and higher temperatures are changing habitat ranges for plants and animals. In some regions, the pace of change is also throwing off the delicate timing of pollination, putting plants and pollinators such as bees at risk.

Some Species are Already Migrating

Most plant and animal species can tolerate or at least recover from short-term changes in climate, such as a heat wave. When the changes last longer, however, organisms may need to migrate into new areas to adapt for survival.

Some species are already moving toward higher latitudes and altitudes with cooler temperatures, altering their geographic territory to stay within their optimal climate. Fish populations, for example, have shifted toward the poles as ocean temperatures have risen.

Fish migration chart.
Changes in centers of biomass aggregated across all species by region. Data not available for all years. Chart: The Conversation, CC-BY-ND Source: NOAA 

Pollinators such as bees can also shift their ranges.

Bumblebees, for example, are adapted for cooler regions because of their fuzzy bodies. Some bumblebee populations have been disappearing from the southern parts of their geographic range and have been found in cooler regions to the north and in more mountainous areas. That could increase competition with existing bumblebee populations.

Plants And Pollinators Can Get Out Of Sync

Plants and their pollinators face another problem as the rate of climate change increases: Many plants rely on insects and other animals for seed and pollen dispersal.

Much of that pollen dispersal is accomplished by native pollinators. About 75% of plant species in North America require an insect pollinator – bees, butterflies, moths, flies, beetles, wasps, birds and bats. In fact, 1 in 3 bites of food you eat depend on a pollinator, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

So, even if a species successfully migrates into a new territory, it can face a mismatch of pollination timing. This is known as phenological mismatch.

A butterfly on a flower.
Monarch butterflies migrate each year and rely on plants blooming along their path to provide food.   Photo: Clint Wirick via Wikimedia Commons

During the winter, insects go into a hibernation known as diapause, migrate or take up shelter underground, under rocks or in leaf litter. These insect pollinators use temperature and daylight length as cues for when to emerge or when to migrate to their spring and summer habitats.

As the rate of climate change increases, the chances of a timing mismatch between pollinators and the plants they pollinate rise.

With an increase in temperature, many plants are blooming earlier in the spring. If bees or other pollinators emerge at their “normal” time, flowers may already be blooming, reducing their chance for pollination.

If pollinators emerge too early, they may struggle to survive if their normal food sources are not yet available. Native bees, for example, rely on pollen for much of the protein they need for growing and thriving.

Wild Bees are Emerging Earlier

This kind of shift in timing is already happening with bees in the U.S.

Studies have shown that the date wild bees emerge in the U.S. has shifted by 10.4 days earlier over the past 130 years, and the pace is accelerating.

One study found wild bees across species have been changing their phenology, or timing of seasonal activities, and over the past 50 years the emergence date is four times faster. That means wild bees were emerging roughly eight days earlier in 2020 than they did in 1970.

A bee on a large white blossom.
A bee pollinates an almond tree in an orchard. Photo: David Kosling, via Wikimedia Commons

This trend of earlier emergence is generally consistent across organisms with the accelerating rate of climate change. If the timing mismatches continue to worsen, it could exacerbate the decline of pollinator populations and result in inadequate pollination for plants that rely on them.

Pollinator decline and inadequate pollination already account for a 3% to 5% decline in global fruit, vegetable, spice and nut production annually, a recent study found.

Without pollinators, ecosystems are less resilient − they are unable to absorb disturbances such as wildfires, adapt to changes, and recover from environmental stressors such as pollution, drought or floods.

Managing Climate Change

Pollinators face many other risks from human activities, including habitat loss from development and harm from pesticide use. Climate change adds to that list.

Taking steps to reduce the activities driving global warming can help keep these species thriving and carrying out their roles in nature into the future.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article HERE.

Photo: David Kosling, U.S. Department of Agriculture, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-NC-ND


CLICK HERE TO DONATE IN SUPPORT OF DCREPORT’S NONPROFIT MISSION

The post Bees, Fish, and Plants Reveal the Toll of Climate Change appeared first on DCReport.org.

Read the whole story
DGA51
7 hours ago
reply
We've all noticed more storms but as the climate changes there are many more subtle effects.
Central Pennsyltucky
Share this story
Delete

TX: Furry Panic Is Back

1 Comment

It has been three years and change since the Great Furry Panic first swept school policy circles. 

Patient Zero for this fake story seems to be Michigan's Midland Public Schools board meeting in December of 2021, at which a mother spoke claiming she was informed that litter boxes had been added in bathrooms for students who "identify as cats", calling it a "nationwide" issue and pointing to an "agenda that is being pushed" (a "nefarious" one). The co-chair of the Michigan GOP promoted the stories ("Parent heroes will TAKE BACK our schools), and before you could say crazy-pants disinformation campaign, the story was being covered by Buzzfeed, USA Today, and the New York Times.

There's also a theory that the post-Columbine practice of keeping an emergency bucket in the classroom  in case students are trapped there by another gunman. Some schools include kitty litter in their emergency bucket.

At any rate, the story spread through the far right dope-o-sphere. Folks started noting the spread of furry panic back at the beginning of 2022. There are schools, the story goes, that allow students to self-identify as animals, wear their furry costumes, eat sitting on the floor, do their business in litter boxes. So far there has not been a single factual foundation for any of these stories. Nor, for that matter, do the stories get it right when it comes to Furry culture and behavior (furries do not, for instance, wear their outfits to work and insist on acting as animals or pooping by their desks). But it didn't matter. 

2022 was a banner year for furry panic.

In Colorado, the GOP candidate for governor has tripled down on the claim that students are self-identifying as animals throughout the Denver with the support of their school districts, despite repeated debunking and denials. 

Minnesota also has a GOP gubernatorial candidate who repeated the litter box claim, despite debunking.

In Tennessee, school leaders had to take time to respond to a litter box claim by a state senator

South Carolina districts felt the need to respond to litter box stories. In Wyoming, parents told a board they were worried that furries were covered in equality policies. And Rhode Island. And Pennsylvania. And New York. And Illinois. And Oregon. Oh, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, too.

In Nebraska, in a rare apology, a state senator had to admit that the furry rumor he had repeated was baloney in March. In Texas, a GOP house candidate went with the relatively milder "lowered tables" story in January. A South Dakota school district had to explain to a parent in July that no, they would not be putting in litter boxes for furry students. Maine was battling back the litter box rumors in May. In April, a Wisconsin school district had to explain that they have no "furry protocol."

The whole hoax even has its own Wikipedia page

There has never been a single confirmed incident, ever.

And yet.

Texas has HB 54, "Relating to the display of and allowance for non-human behaviors in Texas schools." Also known as the "Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education (F.U.R.R.I.E.S.) Act." The bill has five legislators signed on as authors, and a whopping 51 co-authors. Governor Greg Abbott backs the bill. There are 22 pages of public comments compiled, and some of them are just as silly as you expect.
[W]e are tired of DEI, distractions, and affirmation of FURRY behavior in schools. Children should be learning how to read and excel in math, not playing make-believe at school. Please specifically write into the Code of Conduct that this behavior is not acceptable in schools or in society. In all K-12 schools.
Keatha Brown
Moms for Liberty, Montgomery TX
Children attend school are there to learn reading, writing, math, science, etc. I do respect each person has their own individual style when they dress but what I don't approve of is children attending school dressed like an animal and pretending, acting and portraying that they are indeed an animal. Its a distraction to other children attending classes at school and teachers and staff already have enough challenges in schools and they don't need these additional types of behaviors to deal with. Children shouldn't be acting like animals, making sounds like animals, wanting to eat like or dressing like animals. If they truly feel like they are an animal, they should be referred to a mental health professional. This would also go along the lines of a child wanting to be an alien
Jennifer White
Moms For Liberty Williamson County Round Rock, TX
Please support HB 54. I have been in education over 45 years. Non- human behaviors should not be accepted or catered to in public schools. What cat learns to read?
Susan Perez
Citizens for Education Reform
Lubbock, TX
And more in the same vein. The vast majority of the comments are opposed to the bill, hitting it with terms like "silly," "ridiculous," "stupid," and "waste of time." The Libertarian Party of Texas opposes it. Many accused the legislature of trying to solve a non-existent problem. Many tell stories of small children who like to play in ways that sometimes include animal noises. The parent of an autistic child explains how fur-like materials soothe the child. 

The bill itself is remarkably specific in defining "non-human behavior" with nine or so items on the list of "behaviors of accessories" not typically "displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species."  No animal noise, tails, ears, or licking yourself for "purposes of grooming or maintenance." There are exceptions for Halloween and school mascots or plays. 

But it's worth noting that the bill goes way beyond the standard furry litter box panic to target any sort of animal-ish behavior-- ears on headbands, tails, animal noises (like children don't make inhuman noises on a regular basis). 

The bill comes from Rep. Stan Gerdes. Gerdes was endorsed last year by Greg Abbott when he was up against Tom Glass, who was endorsed by AG Ken Paxton. Gerdes did vote for vouchers, but he also voted for the impeachment of Paxton. He previously worked under Rick Perry both when Perry was Texas governor and as US Secretary of Energy. He won his first election to the House in 2022, then again last year. Both campaigns were pricey-- $600K in 2022 and almost a million in 2024 (just for the primary). 

At Tuesday night's hearing, he claimed that the bill was in response to stories about furries that have been denied by the district superintendent. Asked if he could cite a single confirmed instance of a school making furry accommodations, Gerdes said he could not, even though he originally came out swinging, as reported by Benjamin Wermund at the Houston Chronicle:
When Gerdes introduced the legislation last month, he said he fully expected members of the subculture he was targeting to show up at the Capitol "in full furry vengeance" when the bill was heard.

"Just to be clear - they won't be getting any litter boxes in the Texas Capitol," the Smithville Republican said in a press release announcing the bill.

But there were no so-called furries or litter boxes at the late-night hearing Tuesday. Instead, the four people who showed up to testify against the measure included a public school teacher and a Texan who worried the measure could affect students with disabilities.
Rep. James Talarico labeled the bill as one more attempt by Abbott and his crew to discredit public schools:
That's because if you want to defund neighborhood schools across the state, you have to get Texans to turn against their public schools. So you call librarians groomers, you accuse teachers of indoctrination, and now you say that schools are providing litter boxes to students. That's how all of this is tied together.

 It's a bill designed to create furor over a non-existent problem. Currently the bill is sitting in committee, and if there is a lick of sense left in some corners of Texas, it will never emerge from there. 


Read the whole story
DGA51
19 hours ago
reply
Texas is very good at finding solutions for problems that do not exist.
Central Pennsyltucky
Share this story
Delete

Ep. 47: 100 Days Of Fascist Failure

1 Share

The Opinionated Ogre Podcast is 100% listener-supported. Please help us continue to inform/amuse/outrage you by becoming a supporting subscriber today for only $5 a month or just $50 a year! If not, it’s all good. Welcome to the Ogre Nation anyway!

🎤The Ogre Nation Needs YOU!🎤

100 days of fascism, crime, incompetence, and stupidity. But America still stands and we the people are fucking angry. The fucking fascists are hard at work destroying everything but it’s getting harder every day and now they’re getting sloppier and more desperate as time runs out.

Join me and Shannon as we go over the damage they’ve done and what comes next.


Ogre Nation News Update!

1:45 - 29:22 Trump wanted to be Hitler and overthrow democracy in less than 100 days and failed utterly. He broke a lot of stuff and hurt a lot of people but not enough to get the job done and he’s running out of time.

29:23 - 38:46 What are the fascist failures going to do next now that their agenda is in jeopardy? Nothing good.

38:47 - 42:20 Florida has decided that if Trump can ignore the courts, so can they and that is going to be a problem

42:21 - 51:37 This Week in Republican Racism

51:38 - 1:00:35 Headlines for Short Attention Spans!

1:00:36 - 1:08:24 Our Self-care for the Week


Things We Discussed During The Show

CNN Poll: Trump’s approval at 100 days lower than any president in at least seven decades

Trump says he’ll blame Biden again for 2nd quarter GDP after blaming him for Q1 drop

Empty shelves, trucking layoffs lead to a summer recession in Apollo’s shocking trade fight timeline

Three US citizen children, one with cancer, deported to Honduras, lawyers say

In rare rebuke of Putin, Trump urges Russia to ‘STOP!’ after deadly attack on Kyiv

Internal Memos: Senior USAID Leaders Warned Trump Appointees of Hundreds of Thousands of Deaths From Closing Agency

Trump’s counterterrorism czar says Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s supporters could be charged with ‘aiding and abetting’

‘Color me surprised and shocked’: Judge blasts Florida AG for defying order on immigration law

Trump says he ‘could’ bring Abrego Garcia back from El Salvador, but won’t

ICE Invades Wrong Home, Steals Their Life Savings, and Then Leaves

Utah Farmers Signed Up for Federally Funded Therapy. Then the Money Stopped.

Wide-ranging crackdown on abortion pills passes Texas Senate

Literal fake news - ‘Abortion pill’ found to have ‘severe adverse effects’ for 1 in 10 women, study finds

A DOGE Aide Involved in Dismantling Consumer Bureau Owns Stock in Companies That Could Benefit From the Cuts





Download audio: https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/162607494/ad5cf8b65306b8549192860080adc547.mp3
Read the whole story
DGA51
23 hours ago
reply
Central Pennsyltucky
Share this story
Delete

From Help to Harm: How the Government Is Quietly Repurposing Your Data

1 Comment

The Conversation logoWhat Started as Public Health Tools Are Now Feeding Mass Surveillance

A whistleblower at the National Labor Relations Board reported an unusual spike in potentially sensitive data flowing out of the agency’s network in early March 2025 when staffers from the Department of Government Efficiency, which goes by DOGE, were granted access to the agency’s databases. On April 7, the Department of Homeland Security gained access to Internal Revenue Service tax data.

These seemingly unrelated events are examples of recent developments in the transformation of the structure and purpose of federal government data repositories. I am a researcher who studies the intersection of migration, data governance and digital technologies. I’m tracking how data that people provide to U.S. government agencies for public services such as tax filing, health care enrollment, unemployment assistance and education support is increasingly being redirected toward surveillance and law enforcement.

Originally collected to facilitate health care, eligibility for services and the administration of public services, this information is now shared across government agencies and with private companies, reshaping the infrastructure of public services into a mechanism of control. Once confined to separate bureaucracies, data now flows freely through a network of interagency agreements, outsourcing contracts and commercial partnerships built up in recent decades.

These data-sharing arrangements often take place outside public scrutiny, driven by national security justifications, fraud prevention initiatives and digital modernization efforts. The result is that the structure of government is quietly transforming into an integrated surveillance apparatus, capable of monitoring, predicting and flagging behavior at an unprecedented scale.

Executive orders signed by President Donald Trump aim to remove remaining institutional and legal barriers to completing this massive surveillance system.

DOGE and the Private Sector

Central to this transformation is DOGE, which is tasked via an executive order to “promote inter-operability between agency networks and systems, ensure data integrity, and facilitate responsible data collection and synchronization.” An additional executive order calls for the federal government to eliminate its information silos.

By building interoperable systems, DOGE can enable real-time, cross-agency access to sensitive information and create a centralized database on people within the U.S. These developments are framed as administrative streamlining but lay the groundwork for mass surveillance.

Key to this data repurposing are public-private partnerships. The DHS and other agencies have turned to third-party contractors and data brokers to bypass direct restrictions. These intermediaries also consolidate data from social media, utility companies, supermarkets and many other sources, enabling enforcement agencies to construct detailed digital profiles of people without explicit consent or judicial oversight.

Palantir, a private data firm and prominent federal contractor, supplies investigative platforms to agencies such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Defense, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Internal Revenue Service. These platforms aggregate data from various sources – driver’s license photos, social services, financial information, educational data – and present it in centralized dashboards designed for predictive policing and algorithmic profiling. These tools extend government reach in ways that challenge existing norms of privacy and consent.

The Role of AI

Artificial intelligence has further accelerated this shift.

Predictive algorithms now scan vast amounts of data to generate risk scores, detect anomalies and flag potential threats.

These systems ingest data from school enrollment records, housing applications, utility usage and even social media, all made available through contracts with data brokers and tech companies. Because these systems rely on machine learning, their inner workings are often proprietary, unexplainable and beyond meaningful public accountability.

Data privacy researcher Justin Sherman explains the astonishing amount of information data brokers have about you.

Sometimes the results are inaccurate, generated by AI hallucinations – responses AI systems produce that sound convincing but are incorrect, made up or irrelevant. Minor data discrepancies can lead to major consequences: job loss, denial of benefits and wrongful targeting in law enforcement operations. Once flagged, individuals rarely have a clear pathway to contest the system’s conclusions.

Digital Profiling

Participation in civic life, applying for a loan, seeking disaster relief and requesting student aid now contribute to a person’s digital footprint. Government entities could later interpret that data in ways that allow them to deny access to assistance. Data collected under the banner of care could be mined for evidence to justify placing someone under surveillance. And with growing dependence on private contractors, the boundaries between public governance and corporate surveillance continue to erode.

Artificial intelligence, facial recognition systems and predictive profiling systems lack oversight. They also disproportionately affect low-income individuals, immigrants and people of color, who are more frequently flagged as risks.

Initially built for benefits verification or crisis response, these data systems now feed into broader surveillance networks. The implications are profound. What began as a system targeting noncitizens and fraud suspects could easily be generalized to everyone in the country.

Eyes on Everyone

This is not merely a question of data privacy. It is a broader transformation in the logic of governance. Systems once designed for administration have become tools for tracking and predicting people’s behavior. In this new paradigm, oversight is sparse and accountability is minimal.

AI allows for the interpretation of behavioral patterns at scale without direct interrogation or verification. Inferences replace facts. Correlations replace testimony.

The risk extends to everyone. While these technologies are often first deployed at the margins of society – against migrants, welfare recipients or those deemed “high risk” – there’s little to limit their scope. As the infrastructure expands, so does its reach into the lives of all citizens.

With every form submitted, interaction logged and device used, a digital profile deepens, often out of sight. The infrastructure for pervasive surveillance is in place. What remains uncertain is how far it will be allowed to go.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article HERE.

Photo at top: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement via Wikimedia Commons


CLICK HERE TO DONATE IN SUPPORT OF DCREPORT’S NONPROFIT MISSION

The post From Help to Harm: How the Government Is Quietly Repurposing Your Data appeared first on DCReport.org.

Read the whole story
DGA51
1 day ago
reply
In this new paradigm, oversight is sparse and accountability is minimal.
Central Pennsyltucky
Share this story
Delete

Mrs. Secretary Hegseth takes command at the Pentagon

1 Comment
Mrs. Secretary Hegseth escorts her husband to White House Easter Egg hunt

Here’s something quaint to tickle your funny bone on this 101st Dark Night of Our Souls: Practically the same day the Washington Post reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been making use of his wife Jennifer in an “unorthodox role” in the Pentagon, Hegseth announced that he was eliminating a program intended to empower women’s participation in what the Post called “national security spaces” that include the Pentagon. In times which now seem to have faded into a distant, fuzzy past, this would have been called a policy contradiction, or even – here’s another good one – hypocritical.

Mrs. Hegseth, the Defense Secretary’s third wife, was a producer at Fox News when Hegseth was a guest on the morning chat-show “Fox and Friends.” She was pregnant with his child at the same time Hegseth was getting a divorce from his second wife. This was also around the same time he allegedly sexually assaulted a woman at a hotel in Lake Tahoe in 2017. He later paid the woman $50,000 to settle a lawsuit she filed against him for the sexual assault. Hegseth and Jennifer would later marry in a ceremony at one of Trump’s golf clubs in New Jersey in 2019.

Hegseth has admitted to having a drinking problem during the time he allegedly assaulted the woman in Lake Tahoe. During his confirmation hearings, he promised that he would not consume “even a drop of alcohol” if he was confirmed as Defense Secretary. In an interview last year with conservative commentator Megyn Kelly, Hegseth claimed that his “two J’s,” Jesus and Jennifer, had changed him and made him a different person from the man he was when he was taking the staff of a veterans’ group he chaired to strip clubs and standing on the tops of bars and chug-a-lugging beers and shots. “Without those two J’s,” Hegseth told Kelly on her podcast, “I wouldn’t be sitting here right now.”

The Secretary of Defense seems to have rewarded one of his “J’s” by regularly taking her to work at the Pentagon, where she has been included in high-level meetings with his counterparts from Great Britain and other countries. He has taken her on official trips to Europe for meetings with NATO countries that have pledged support for Ukraine and the Munich Security Conference in February.

Jennifer Hegseth was also included in at least one chat group on the social media platform Signal during which Hegseth shared specific attack plans on Houthi rebels in Yemen. The Washington Post reported yesterday that there appears to have been a third Signal chat organized by Hegseth that included his wife. Others on that Signal chat included Tami Radabaugh, described by the Post as “a former Fox News producer overseeing how Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon engage with the media,” and Sean Parnell, a senior advisor to Hegseth and one of the Pentagon spokesmen. Why Hegseth would need not one, but two former Fox News producers in a chat group to discuss top secret military affairs has not been explained by either Hegseth or spokesmen for the Pentagon.

Hegseth has engaged in other “unorthodox” behavior in his new position overseeing the 1.4 million members of the nation’s uniformed military services and another 1.5 million civilian defense employees. It was recently revealed that Hegseth had an insecure wired public internet connection installed on one of his office computers so that he could use the Signal program on that machine. (Commercial cell phones do not work well in the Pentagon which was constructed using thick walls of reinforced concrete that is not friendly to cell signals.)

Jennifer Hegseth’s presence around the E-Ring at the Pentagon is ubiquitous enough that she is frequently referred to as “The Leash,” apparently a reference to the tight control she exerts over her dry-drunk alcoholic husband. Other Pentagon staffers refer to her as “Yoko Ono,” who was widely seen as such a controlling influence over her husband John Lennon that their relationship was thought to be one of the causes of the break-up of the Beatles.

His wife hasn’t been able to keep Hegseth out of other problems he has faced. Hegseth recently fired two of his closest advisers for allegedly leaking stories to the press. He ordered that the two be investigated by the Pentagon Inspector General. Those investigations were dropped last week, but the two aides have not been rehired. Hegseth also got rid of his chief of staff, Joe Kasper, who was closely involved in the firings surrounding leaks about the two Signal chats Hegseth was involved in concerning the air attacks on Houthi positions in Yemen. Kasper was originally supposed to “transition” to a different job in the Pentagon, but last week, it was announced that he would be leaving Defense Department employ altogether. He will return to “government relations and consulting,” according to a report in Politico.

No Secretary of Defense in American history has had his wife as an informal advisor who frequently accompanies her husband to work. Jennifer Hegseth has been involved in interviews with prospective hires for Pentagon jobs, either sitting in on interviews with her husband or interviewing job candidates herself. Jennifer Hegseth does not have an official Pentagon position or job title. Nor does she have the kind of high-level security clearance that would ordinarily be required if someone was to sit in on top-level meetings with foreign officials at which highly sensitive material would be discussed.

As far as the Signal chats are concerned, there has never been in the history of this country another instance of official conversations or contacts taking place between high level officers of the Department of Defense outside of official channels, so there is no comparison that can be made involving who had the requisite security clearances and “need to know” about military attack plans of the kind that were shared with others by Hegseth and his wife over Signal.

As Secretary of Defense, Hegseth appears to stand alone in his level of unpreparedness for the job and incompetence once in office. His alcoholism alone would have been an absolute disqualifier in previous administrations of both political parties, as would the charges he faced for sexually assaulting a woman. Even adultery would have been a disqualifier in past years.

Hegseth’s intended elimination of the “Women, Peace and Security” program this week has been misbegotten and mishandled right from the start. Hegseth posted this announcement on X: “This morning, I proudly ENDED the “Women, Peace & Security” (WPS) program inside the @DeptofDefense. WPS is yet another woke divisive/social justice/Biden initiative that overburdens our commanders and troops — distracting from our core task: WAR-FIGHTING.”

The Women, Peace and Security program was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Trump in his first term. Trump’s Homeland Security Secretary, Kristi Noem, was the lead sponsor of the bill in the House, and his Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, was the lead co-sponsor of the bi-partisan bill in the Senate. While he was a congressman, Trump’s National Security Adviser, Michael Walz, was the chairman of the House WPS caucus for several years.

This is, of course, the problem with the kind of broad-brush approach the Trump administration has taken to all things even marginally identifiable as DEI-related. This country’s uniformed military is about 18 percent female. Countless women work in civilian positions in the Department of Defense, and there have been women who have served as Secretaries of several of the military services, as well as undersecretaries and deputy secretaries, not only of defense and the military services, but in all the intelligence agencies. The WPS program was intended to encourage and empower women to work in capacities at all levels of the nation’s defense. One of the projects championed by the WPS program was an effort to ensure that military combat gear and ballistic defense vests and helmets fit the female body as well as they fit men. Hegseth and the rest of the Republican manosphere can say what they want about women’s roles in the combat arms, but in modern warfare, everyone is vulnerable to enemy attack by drones, missiles, artillery and airstrikes, even soldiers serving in combat support positions like transportation, signal, and supply.

What Hegseth wants to do is cancel the program that helped to ensure that women in military positions vulnerable to enemy attack are as well protected as men. That should be a big help when it comes to recruiting and retaining women in military service.

Trump was quoted in one of his 100-day interviews as saying of Hegseth, “I think he’s going to get it together.” Well, if Trump ends up firing Pete, he could appoint Jennifer to replace him. She comes prepared with the requisite background at Fox News and has had plenty of on-the-job training. She even has her own account on Signal.

We need your support to get through the next 100 days of this nightmare. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Give a gift subscription

Leave a comment

Share

Read the whole story
DGA51
1 day ago
reply
Her main job is to keep him undrunk.
Central Pennsyltucky
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories